AI Legal Representation: The Shocking Future of Justice Unveiled

Here’s a brief excerpt summarizing the article:

In a groundbreaking court case, Jerome Dewald used an **AI-generated avatar** to argue his employment dispute before New York’s Supreme Court Appellate Division. The attempt sparked controversy as judges quickly realized the avatar was not a real person, leading to a stern warning against using the courtroom as a business platform[1][2][3]. This incident highlights the legal system’s fraught relationship with AI, echoing past issues like ChatGPT’s “hallucinations” and the urgent need for clear guidelines on AI use in justice[1][3].

Elon Musk’s AI Surveillance Sparks Fear Among Federal Workers

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is sparking controversy by using AI to monitor federal workers’ communications. Critics argue this surveillance infringes on privacy, targets ideological dissent, and lacks oversight, while proponents see it as a means to enhance efficiency[1][3][4]. Ethical and legal concerns abound, with implications for workplace morale and free speech[4][8].